As I have spent time in existing buildings over the years, whether surveying a building for potential renovations, reviewing existing conditions or doing inspections, the concept of the building “meeting code” often comes up. Building owners, building maintenance staff, or anyone that is concerned with the operation or maintenance of a building wants to know if their building is up to code. Unfortunately, “meeting code” can mean several different things, and it is easy to lose track of which codes actually apply to an existing building. Does the International Building Code apply? Or is the International Existing Building Code? Or both? In this post, we’ll explore the various building and fire codes that could apply to your existing building. There are many other codes (e.g. electrical, elevator) that we won’t specifically address, but the general thought process for those is similar. All references will be to the 2021 ICC codes, but many states and local jurisdictions modify these requirements, so be sure to verify the specific requirements for your area. Note: If your building is a one or two family dwelling or a townhouse, the International Residential Code (IRC) is likely the applicable code. The IBC and IEBC typically do not apply to such buildings. Existing Building Scenario 1: Normal OperationsIf you have an existing, permitted, occupied building that is proceeding with normal operations (meaning there is no construction activity occurring and you are not changing the use or occupancy of the building from the original design), “meeting code” is fairly simple. IBC/IEBC ComplianceFirst, the International Building Code (IBC) and International Existing Building Code (IEBC) generally do not apply to your building. The application of both codes is limited to situations where some level of work is occurring to the building. For example, IBC 102.3.2 states: The legal occupancy of any building existing on the date of adoption of this code shall be permitted to continue without change, except as otherwise specifically provided in this code, the International Fire Code or International Property Maintenance Code, or as is deemed necessary by the building official for the general safety and welfare of the occupants and the public. In other words, the IBC does not require any change to your building unless there is a specific requirement in the International Fire Code (IFC), International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC), or the code official determines there is a required change necessary because of a threat to public safety. We’ll get to the IFC and IPMC shortly, but the final point is an important one to note. The code language does give the Building Code Official the authority to require a change to your building if they deem it is necessary for safety reasons. In my experience, this authority is typically reserved for use when there is a clear danger to occupant safety. As a hypothetical example: if your building has an exit stairway that does not have any handrails, even though it was permitted that way from the beginning, the code official could deem the lack of handrails a big enough safety risk that they require you to install them. Assuming your building does not have any blatant safety risks, though, it’s unlikely that the code official would use this language to force a change in your building. Similar to IBC Section 102.3.2, the IEBC has the exact same language in Section 101.4. Additionally, the overall scoping language in IEBC 101.2 states that the provisions of the IEBC apply to the “repair, alteration, change of occupancy, addition to and relocation of existing buildings.” So if you are not performing any of those actions on your building, the IEBC does not apply. What about NFPA 101?If you are in a jurisdiction that adopts NFPA 101, there are additional requirements you need to consider. Unlike the ICC, which separates the IBC and IEBC into two different codes, NFPA 101 applies to both new and existing buildings. For example, NFPA 101 Section 7.1.1 states “Means of egress for both new and existing buildings shall comply with this chapter.” NFPA 101 Chapters 7-11 all apply to both new and existing buildings, so you’ll need to review these chapters for specific existing building requirements that could apply to your situation. After Chapter 11, NFPA 101 contains occupancy-specific chapters that only apply if those occupancies are in your building. These chapters alternate between new and existing occupancies (for example, Chapter 12 applies to new assembly occupancies and Chapter 13 applies to existing assembly occupancies). So the requirements found in any of the applicable “existing” chapters in NFPA 101 would also apply to your building. IFC ComplianceSecond, certain portions of the IFC will apply to your building. The application of the IFC is divided into two categories:
IFC Construction and Design RequirementsPer IFC Section 102.1, the construction and design provisions of the IFC “apply to:
In our Scenario 1 case, Items 1 and 2 would not apply since we are an existing, permitted building. Items 3 and 4 would apply, though. Item 3 sends us to IFC Chapter 11, and, Item 4, similar to the IBC, gives the code official authority to enforce the IFC on existing buildings if they deem there to be a distinct hazard to life or property. IFC Chapter 11 primarily focuses on fire safety and means of egress requirements. A few examples include:
These requirements are fairly basic and typically are not difficult to achieve, but this would be a good section to thumb through to determine if they apply to your building. IFC Section 1103.1 details which sections of Chapter 11 apply based on the use and occupancy classifications in your building. IFC Administrative, Operational and Maintenance ProvisionsPer IFC Section 102.2, the administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of the IFC “apply to:
In our Scenario 1 case, both of these items apply. This means you’ll need to review the IFC chapters that are relevant to the given system or component of your building under consideration to determine if there are any applicable requirements. For example, if you are working with a dry-cleaning facility, there are requirements in IFC Chapter 21 that would apply to how you operate the facility and equipment. What about NFPA 1?If you are in a jurisdiction that adopts NFPA 1 in lieu of the IFC, you’ll have a little more work to determine what applies to your building. Similar to NFPA 101, NFPA 1 applies to both new and existing buildings and contains requirements for existing buildings throughout the code. You’ll need to review the chapters that are relevant to the given system or component of your building under consideration and then find the requirements for existing buildings located within those relevant chapters. Existing Building Scenario 2: Changing an Existing BuildingIf you are performing work on your building, there are additional code requirements beyond those described for Scenario 1. IEBC ComplianceThe IEBC is your first stop for determining the applicable code requirements. IEBC Section 101.2 states that the provisions of the IEBC apply to the “repair, alteration, change of occupancy, addition to and relocation of existing buildings.” So you first want to review the definitions of each of these terms in IEBC Chapter 2 and determine which apply to the work you are performing in your building. For repair work, the requirements of IEBC Chapter 4 apply. The general intent of this chapter is to maintain the existing level of code compliance in the building (at a minimum), though there are some specific additional requirements depending on the system or component undergoing repair. For relocated building, the requirements of IEBC Chapter 14 apply. For the other IEBC work classifications: alterations, changes of occupancy and additions, there are three potential compliance paths:
Prescriptive Compliance MethodThe prescriptive compliance method essentially requires the work being performed to comply with the requirements of the IBC, with a few exceptions involving situations where IBC compliance is unfeasible for an existing building. For many existing buildings, the requirements of the current edition of the IBC have progressed substantially since the building code that was in effect at the time of original construction, making any attempt to comply with the current IBC requirements difficult. Work Area Compliance MethodThe work area compliance method is the most-commonly used compliance method in the IEBC and generally the most flexible from a technical requirement standpoint. This method applies varying requirements to the work area in the building based on the classification of work that is being performed. When the work area compliance method is used, the scope of work must comply with one or more of the applicable chapters:
For any building alteration, the requirements of Chapter 7 would apply. If the alteration includes “the addition or elimination of any door or window, the reconfiguration or extension of any system, or the installation of any additional equipment,” (IEBC Section 603.1), the requirements of Chapter 8 would also apply for a Level 2 alteration. If the work area exceeds 50% of the building, the requirements of Chapter 9 would also apply for Level 3 alteration. Changes of occupancy and additions using the work area compliance method must comply with Chapters 10 and 11, respectively. Finally, if you have a historic building, be sure to reference IEBC Chapter 12 first, as it modifies several the requirements found in Chapters 7-11. Performance Compliance MethodThe performance compliance method involves the evaluation of a variety of building systems and components (including height/area, compartmentation, vertical openings, means of egress, and fire protection systems). These systems are each assigned a score based on the evaluation criteria found in IEBC Chapter 13. These scores are then added to determine a total building score. If the score is high enough for the occupancy classifications involved, the work is deemed to be in compliance with the IEBC. The performance compliance method is a good option when one aspect of a proposed scope of work cannot conform to the other compliance methods, but the remainder of the building is generally compliant. For example, if an existing building work areas has excessive dead corridor lengths, compliance with the prescriptive compliance method or work area compliance method may be impossible. But the performance compliance method may be a viable option, assuming the building scores well in the other assessment areas. IBC ComplianceAs described above in Scenario 1, compliance with the requirements of the IBC is only required when specifically referenced by the IEBC (or potentially in the IFC and IPMC). That said, if your work complies with the requirements of the current edition of the IBC adopted in your jurisdiction, this will inherently satisfy the requirements of the IEBC prescriptive compliance method. What about NFPA 101?NFPA 101 Chapter 43 applies to any building rehabilitation work, including repairs, renovations, modifications, reconstruction, changes of use/occupancy and additions. Any of these actions would trigger a requirement to comply with NFPA 101 Chapter 43, which then brings in requirements to comply with other portions of NFPA 101, depending on the scope of work. Generally, NFPA 101 Chapter 43 requires compliance with all requirements found in the applicable existing occupancy chapter (Chapters 13,15,17,19, etc.) plus some additional requirements that vary based on the type of work being performed. IFC ComplianceAs described in Scenario 1, application of the IFC is divided into two categories:
IFC Construction and Design RequirementsPer IFC Section 102.1, the construction and design provisions of the IFC “apply to:
Just as in Scenario 1, Items 3 and 4 would also apply to Scenario 2. Additionally, Item 1 would also apply to the work being performed in the building (since it is creating a new condition). Therefore, any requirement found in the IFC that is applicable to a system or component within the work being performed is applicable. This means you’ll need to review the IFC chapters that are relevant to the given system or component of your building under consideration to determine if there are any applicable requirements. IFC Administrative, Operational and Maintenance ProvisionsPer IFC Section 102.2, the administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of the IFC “apply to:
What about NFPA 1There are requirements throughout NFPA 1 that would apply to Scenario 2, so again you’ll need review the chapters that are relevant to the given system or component of your building that will be changed and find the requirements for existing buildings within those chapters. ConclusionThe phrase “meeting code” is used frequently in the A/E/C world but depending on the nature of your building and the work being performed, it can mean many different things!
For an existing building, you likely fall under one of these two scenarios:
Scenario 1 typically requires compliance only with certain portions of the IFC. Scenario 2 requires compliance with the IEBC and the IFC. If you are in a jurisdiction enforcing NFPA 1 and 101, there are also requirements from these codes that apply to both scenarios. Need assistance on your specific project? Add Campbell Code Consulting to your team. They are a full-service code consulting and fire protection engineering firm that can help you navigate complex code challenges.
11 Comments
8/5/2022 12:45:02 am
The article raises some valid points about which codes should apply to an existing building. However, it does not provide a clear answer as to which codes should apply. In my opinion, the most important factor when determining which codes should apply is the purpose of the building. If the building is being used for residential purposes, then the Residential Building Code should apply. If the building is being used for commercial purposes, then the Commercial Building Code should apply.
Reply
Chris Campbell
8/9/2022 08:39:00 am
Jon,
Reply
Ralph Johnston, Jr
1/3/2023 02:02:54 pm
I am interested to know if there are any rulings, guidelines or decisions concerning the use of the phrase " level of activity" in the definition of "Change of Occupancy" in section 202 of the Existing Building Code. If the building was lawfully (predating the adoption of the code) used for a business which closes, does the new owners use for the same purpose constitute a change in "level of activity" by reopening without any change to the building?
Reply
Chris Campbell
1/4/2023 03:38:50 pm
Ralph,
Reply
1/11/2023 11:43:46 am
I appreciate someone writing an explanation for the IEBC.
Reply
9/13/2023 07:21:46 am
So much for writing and sharing this blog post about The idea of a building "meeting code" has come up frequently over my years of working with preexisting structures, whether I was conducting a feasibility study for a proposed renovation, analyzing the current state of the building, or conducting inspections. Anyone with a stake in a building's upkeep or management needs to know whether or not it complies with current regulations. Various interpretations of "meeting code" make it difficult to determine which regulations actually apply to a given structure. Keep writing, I really enjoy reading your posts. Some information here Aips.com.au one must check them also.
Reply
STEVE ANDREWS
2/4/2024 12:58:37 pm
I use Performance Compliance specifically to avoid installation of sprinkler systems when doing change of use or adding units to 7500 ft2 or less buildings. It clearly states you do not need to bring the structure up to code or install mandated sprinklers in say a 2 fam to R2 3 family conversion.
Reply
Cynthia Collins
4/25/2024 09:54:39 am
Our well maintained barn has passed four Chapter 13 Performance reviews done by different architects…our code officer refuses to concede she must accept those results as indicating the barn is code compliant as an existing building (§1301.3)….she also refuses to inspect it (evaluate as per §1301.4.3)….the only option is to go to court?
Reply
steve andrews
9/16/2024 11:33:40 am
I ran into this once of the 20 or so Performance Compliance reports I did in Mass. Owner opted to sprinkle even though he was in the right because 1. bldg was ready to rent (after sprinkler install) and fighting would cost lawyer fees and lost rents for 6-12 months.
Reply
1/15/2025 04:23:06 pm
Does the Level 2 alteration criteria create a "loophole" whereby someone might renovate 49% of a building under a permit. Then once that work is done, apply for a second permit for another 49% of the building, leaving 2% of the building untouched, but renovating 98% of the building under level 2 renovation rules, albeit in two stages?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Categories
All
Sign up to receive Building Code Blog Updates |